| DHC-6 Twin Otter by Viking Air |
Years Produced: 1966 - 1988 (DeHavilland Canada) 2008 - Present (Viking Air)
Number Produced: Roughly 850 (844 by DeHavilland)
Primary Use: Regional utility, passenger and cargo plane.
Engine: 2xPratt and Whitney Canada PT6A-20's producing 550 horsepower (original spec)
Body: All metal 51'9"
Wing: 65' all metal wing
Cruise Speed: 173 mph (278 km/h)
Max Payload: 5,200 lbs
Primary Use: Regional utility, passenger and cargo plane.
Engine: 2xPratt and Whitney Canada PT6A-20's producing 550 horsepower (original spec)
Body: All metal 51'9"
Wing: 65' all metal wing
Cruise Speed: 173 mph (278 km/h)
Max Payload: 5,200 lbs
Last weekend I got to go to the Aviation Expo here in Calgary (post and pics to come later this week). It was awesome and I got to sit in the 2nd Twin Otter ever produced that was flown by Kenn Borek Air. Kenn Borek actually flies the worlds largest fleet of Twin Otters and it's not surprising to see one in their red, black and white flying around in various parts of the globe. Sitting in the Otter was pretty cool. This is a plane I've idolized for a while and always wanted to fly in one. Well, I still haven't flown in one but did get to go check out the Viking Air facility in Calgary which is making the next generation of Twin Otters. More about that later.
This is a Kenn Borek Twin Otter landing in the Canadian North. This video for me really embodies why the Twin Otter is so legendary. Versatility seems to be synonymous with the Twin Otter. If you couldn't already tell, the DHC-6 is STOL capable. Very much so. The Pratt and Whitney engines (made in Lethbridge, Alberta) are able to produce as much thrust in reverse as they are forward. I was told at Viking that Twin Otter pilots don't use breaks, they just use the engines. True or not, the above video really demonsates the ability of the Twin Otter to stop on a postage stamp.
| Sitting in the cockpit of a Twin Otter |
The Twin Otter's versatility has made it feel at home all around the globe. It's often seen flying floats on the coast, ski's and tundra tires in the Canadian and European North's and also a common sight in both the Caribbean and Antarctic regions. Since DeHavilland Canada closed it's doors, aviation companies have been trying to get the Twin Otter back into service. On February 24, 2006, Viking purchased the type certificates for all DeHavilland designs from the DHC-1 Chipmunk to the DHC-7 Dash 7 (the Dash 8 remained owned by Bombardier) which included the Twin Otter and in 2008 production of the Twin Otter was resumed under new management.
| Wish I was there... |
So now that Viking was producing the 400 series Twin Otter, what was the big difference? While touring Viking we were able to discover just that. Probably the most obvious difference if you were to jump in the cockpit of a new DHC-6 would be the avionics. The systems have received a major overhaul and now resemble the cockpit of a modern jet airliner rather than a plucky bush plane. Our guide (who is in charge of quality testing every Twin Otter) said there is 32km of wiring in every new Twin Otter.
The second big difference is the use of composite materials in certain parts of the body. The doors were most notably upgraded to composite materials which saved a lot in weight. All that weight was of course regained in the avionics systems with the wiring (did I mention 32km of it?).
Perhaps something that draws me to this plane most is the pride I witnessed in the people at Viking. They love the plane they make and believe it can do anything (and I've yet to find proof to the contrary) and it really shows. This plane is almost 100% Canadian from the engines to the landing gear. The only parts not made in Canada are the wiring harness found in the nose of the aircraft (made in Wisconsin) and the paint (painted in Spokane).
![]() |
| DHC-6 landing on a beach strip |
Since the re-introduction of the Twin Otter into service, there have been an influx of orders. According to the wonderful people at Viking, they get more orders every month and are scheduled to be delivering into 2016 while tripling their workforce along the way. The sad part? Not one of the orders is from a Canadian customer. With so much national pride inspired by this plane it seems a real shame that no-one has ordered one yet. If you own an aviation company out there, consider the new DHC-6! I promise you it won't disappoint!
- Davezorz
Not all images are original. If one of these images belongs to you and you would like it removed, please let me know.
Not all images are original. If one of these images belongs to you and you would like it removed, please let me know.






.jpg)


.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
